Most U.S. Residents Support Human Genetics Research, Online Poll Says

Most U.S. Residents Support Human Genetics Research, Online Poll Says
0
(0)

A recent survey found that U.S. residents are largely interested in and support continued research into the role of human genetics in treating and possibly curing illnesses such as sickle cell disease (SCD).

Commissioned by the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) in partnership with Research!America, the online survey consisted of 1,100 adults plus another 775 for minority population oversampling. It was conducted in December by Zogby Analytics.

Among the key findings are that most Americans are curious and hopeful about genetics, and largely supportive of federal funding for genetics research. In addition, most citizens believe that genetics research is important to improving family health, and that more study is needed.

The survey also found that consent and privacy are important concerns for participation in this kind of research, and that most Americans have misconceptions about some areas of human genetics. Most respondents were also unfamiliar with promising areas of research such as precision medicine.

Some survey answers were informed by the ancestry and ethnic background of the respondents.

“When it comes to human genetics, the U.S. public is supportive of research, believes more research is needed, and believes it’s important to national health and their families’ health,” Anthony Wynshaw-Boris, MD, PhD, ASHG president, said in a press release.

“It’s exciting how curious and hopeful Americans are about this fast-paced area of research. That said, the survey shows there is still important work to do in educating the public on some genetics basics and how it might benefit them through applications like personalized medicine. It is rewarding to know they would participate in research that could help themselves or a loved one, but they also want assurances about privacy and confidentiality of that research.”

According to the survey, Americans largely believe that genetics will lead to cures for some diseases, and that physicians are able to use genetic data to inform patients’ healthcare. They also believe that individuals who undergo genetic testing will learn “surprising information” about their heritage, and that it will be possible to change genes in embryos to prevent severe disorders such as SCD, cystic fibrosis, or muscular dystrophy.

Thirteen percent of respondents reported having taken a direct-to-consumer genetic test, while 8% said that they were tested through a hospital or research center. Five percent had received genetic counseling, and the same percentage participated in research requiring a blood or saliva sample.

“Lower awareness and higher skepticism among underserved populations reflect legitimate historic experience with research that we need to understand, and the need to improve engagement with diverse populations,” Wynshaw-Boris added.

“Overall, the poll confirms that more can be done to reinforce the progress and potential of genetics research, while also educating the public about rigorous privacy practices and laws already in place for U.S. federal research, and our growing ability to evaluate risks or resilience for common conditions such as heart disease, dementia, diabetes or mental illness.”

In SCD, scientists are working on two different gene therapy strategies — both involving altering the patient’s own hematopoietic stem cells — with several ongoing trials. Recently, a potential gene therapy known as ARU-1801 was designated an orphan product by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, a status that helps to speed development.

Sickle cell disease is a disorder caused by a mutation in the HBB gene, which provides instructions for producing part of hemoglobin, the protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen.

The main advantage that gene therapy has over bone marrow transplantation — currently the sole SCD cure — is that complications such as finding the right match are not a concern.

“Time and again, the public tells us they value medical research,” said Mary Woolley, Research!America’s president and CEO. “Americans believe in the hope research presents to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families and communities.”

In coming months, the ASHG will ramp up public messaging about the value of, and issues related to, human genetics.

“It is an exciting time for human genetics and genomics, and emerging knowledge is speeding discovery and applications in research, medicine and society,” Wynshaw-Boris said.

 

Mary M. Chapman began her professional career at United Press International, running both print and broadcast desks. She then became a Michigan correspondent for what is now Bloomberg BNA, where she mainly covered the automotive industry plus legal, tax and regulatory issues. A member of the Automotive Press Association and one of a relatively small number of women on the car beat, Chapman has discussed the automotive industry multiple times of National Public Radio, and in 2014 was selected as an honorary judge at the prestigious Cobble Beach Concours d’Elegance. She has written for numerous national outlets including Time, People, Al-Jazeera America, Fortune, Daily Beast, MSN.com, Newsweek, The Detroit News and Detroit Free Press. The winner of the Society of Professional Journalists award for outstanding reporting, Chapman has had dozens of articles in The New York Times, including two on the coveted front page. She has completed a manuscript about centenarian car enthusiast Margaret Dunning, titled “Belle of the Concours.”
Total Posts: 94
Margarida graduated with a BS in Health Sciences from the University of Lisbon and a MSc in Biotechnology from Instituto Superior Técnico (IST-UL). She worked as a molecular biologist research associate at a Cambridge UK-based biotech company that discovers and develops therapeutic, fully human monoclonal antibodies.
×
Mary M. Chapman began her professional career at United Press International, running both print and broadcast desks. She then became a Michigan correspondent for what is now Bloomberg BNA, where she mainly covered the automotive industry plus legal, tax and regulatory issues. A member of the Automotive Press Association and one of a relatively small number of women on the car beat, Chapman has discussed the automotive industry multiple times of National Public Radio, and in 2014 was selected as an honorary judge at the prestigious Cobble Beach Concours d’Elegance. She has written for numerous national outlets including Time, People, Al-Jazeera America, Fortune, Daily Beast, MSN.com, Newsweek, The Detroit News and Detroit Free Press. The winner of the Society of Professional Journalists award for outstanding reporting, Chapman has had dozens of articles in The New York Times, including two on the coveted front page. She has completed a manuscript about centenarian car enthusiast Margaret Dunning, titled “Belle of the Concours.”
Latest Posts
  • awareness month events
  • patient questionnaire

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?